4 hours ago
(5 hours ago)BenZoo2 Wrote: I would do it for 38 and 69. I’d probably do it for 38 and 77.
DK Metcalf this offseason went for #52. He's more valuable than Tee.
____________________________________________________________
![[Image: bensack.gif]](https://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1598277/bensack.gif)
Trade Higgins To The Pats?!
|
4 hours ago
(5 hours ago)BenZoo2 Wrote: I would do it for 38 and 69. I’d probably do it for 38 and 77. DK Metcalf this offseason went for #52. He's more valuable than Tee. ____________________________________________________________
![]()
3 hours ago
(4 hours ago)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: DK Metcalf this offseason went for #52. He's more valuable than Tee. That’s somewhat debatable. There’s more to that trade as well. And dk is not available. T can be had if the price is right. ![]()
1 hour ago
(4 hours ago)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: DK Metcalf this offseason went for #52. He's more valuable than Tee. He is also 2 years older than Tee. I would debate who is better. Bengals like and want Tee. Seattle did not want DK and DK wanted out. A different dynamic for those 2. ![]() Please use 2025 free agency to fix the trenches, not the draft!!!!!!!!
1 hour ago
(4 hours ago)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: DK Metcalf this offseason went for #52. He's more valuable than Tee. Different receivers, similar production. Career Yard per target is 8.97 vs 8.71. Tee is younger, DK is more available. I honestly think tee is the better receiver, DK is the more dynamic player. ![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|