Trade Higgins To The Pats?!

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(Yesterday, 09:32 PM)BenZoo2 Wrote: I would do it for 38 and 69.  I’d probably do it for 38 and 77.

DK Metcalf this offseason went for #52. He's more valuable than Tee.

[BenZoo2]

(Yesterday, 10:23 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: DK Metcalf this offseason went for #52. He's more valuable than Tee.

That’s somewhat debatable.  There’s more to that trade as well.  And dk is not available.  T can be had if the price is right.  

[Luvnit2]

(Yesterday, 10:23 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: DK Metcalf this offseason went for #52. He's more valuable than Tee.

He is also 2 years older than Tee. I would debate who is better. Bengals like and want Tee. Seattle did not want DK and DK wanted out. A different dynamic for those 2.

[Bengalbug]

(Yesterday, 10:23 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: DK Metcalf this offseason went for #52. He's more valuable than Tee.

Different receivers, similar production. Career Yard per target is 8.97 vs 8.71.

Tee is younger, DK is more available.

I honestly think tee is the better receiver, DK is the more dynamic player.

[Bronxbengal]

The Bengals FO has indicated they are going to re-sign Tee. This topic is irrelevant analogous to all these mock drafts created by so called experts which is fantasy and delusional.