Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The 2025 Bengals Rosters Thread: Coaches & Players
Well, it is not a signing, per se, but Zach Moss has agreed to a reworked contract and will play for us in 2025. Originally reported by SI.

https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/zack_moss_agrees_to_re_worked_deal_will_play_for_cincinnati_bengals_in_2025/s1_16652_42084541

I do not know how much cap space we will save. The old cap number was $4.8 mil. $1.5 mil in dead money if cut for a $3.3+ mil in savings.

https://overthecap.com/salary-cap/cincinnati-bengals

We must be reasonably sure he will recover from the neck injury. And I think you can take RB off the board in the draft. Unless we decide to carry 4. Good RB draft,,but I think we have bigger needs st G (1-2), S, DT, DE, and also TE. Depth at WR & OT would also be useful. As would a speedier LB, another CB, and even a PK.
Reply/Quote
(7 hours ago)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Well, it is not a signing, per se, but Zach Moss has agreed to a reworked contract and will play for us in 2025. Originally reported by SI.

https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/zack_moss_agrees_to_re_worked_deal_will_play_for_cincinnati_bengals_in_2025/s1_16652_42084541

I do not know how much cap space we will save. The old cap number was $4.8 mil. $1.5 mil in dead money if cut for a $3.3+ mil in savings.

https://overthecap.com/salary-cap/cincinnati-bengals

We must be reasonably sure he will recover from  the neck injury. And I think you can take RB off the board in the draft. Unless we decide to carry 4. Good RB draft,,but I think we have bigger needs st G (1-2), S, DT, DE, and also TE. Depth at WR & OT would also be useful. As would a speedier LB, another CB, and even a PK.

I like him 1.6 million or less, 2.0 Meh

Glad they reworked the deal since Brown became our #1 RB

It is a very heavy RB class, we could get a very good one in round 6, but definitely not a priority if he is healthy so unless Henderson is sitting there at pick 81, no need to go with a RB wit first 5 picks.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
 Please use 2025 free agency to fix the trenches, not the draft!!!!!!!!
Reply/Quote
I guess this frees up another pick so they don’t have to grab a RB. However, if they have filled some G/defensive needs within the first 3-4 rounds and there’s a RB they like still available then they should take him - especially if he has some speed.

If Brown were to miss time they would not have a RB who is capable of filling in as RB1.
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)