Pretty crazy Burrow stat

[NUGDUKWE]

(07-02-2025, 04:32 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: But Burrow evidently loves them.... just saying. 

All the more reason for the FO to invest in the OL. Hoping a new coach can solve our issues seems like a recipe for disaster. 

[sandwedge]

(07-02-2025, 08:00 PM)NUGDUKWE Wrote: All the more reason for the FO to invest in the OL. Hoping a new coach can solve our issues seems like a recipe for disaster. 

Huh? 

[Bilbo Saggins]

(06-30-2025, 12:58 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Don't worry, Lucas Patrick was added to the OL to save the day.

Risner?  Scherff?  Nah.  We've got Puke-as Asslick.  From Giacuic to Livings to Bodine they just don't care.  It's their most glaring flaw.  Zero ***** given about IOL play.  Shameless, asshole caliber negligence.  Gooberfuck ownership and GM quality.  Maybe if they keep doing the same goddamned thing for 7,000 years they'll finally win a Super Bowl against more deserving strategists.  

[Whatever]

(07-02-2025, 10:45 AM)KillerGoose Wrote: I have a strong suspicion it is the amount of empty Cincinnati likes to run. I have never been able to find personnel data so I can't prove it empirically but I do know that Cincinnati has been running empty more than any other team in the league. This coupled with a shaky offensive line could lead to the stat posted earlier. That's my hypothesis, at least. 

I do believe that somewhat plays into it, as they will sometimes allow a free rusher when the defense blitzes to get that extra guy in the pattern and trust Joe to get it out quick.

But there's other issues, unfortunately.  I don't think I've seen Volson pick up a stunt in his three years as a starter.  He's just oblivious when he's out there.  Cappa got absolutely destroyed on a number of reps last year.  Jonah would have similar things happen to him against guys like Watt and Garrett. Lots of relatively poor athletes for their positions just getting the brakes beaten off of them by much better talent across from them.  

The former is a risk vs reward trade off and an informed decision.  The latter is just lack of talent.

[Whatever]

(07-02-2025, 08:00 PM)NUGDUKWE Wrote: All the more reason for the FO to invest in the OL. Hoping a new coach can solve our issues seems like a recipe for disaster. 

They will likely have 3 new opening day starters this year vs last year.  

Pollack's philosophy just didn't work, especially for our offense.  His "glass eaters" BS was outdated, and we tried for years to make it work with physically overmatched players that had "grit" and "want to".  It was especially mismatched with an offense that wanted to run a lot of wide zone, which requires more athletic linemen capable of making reach blocks and second level blocks.

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(07-02-2025, 08:00 PM)NUGDUKWE Wrote: All the more reason for the FO to invest in the OL. Hoping a new coach can solve our issues seems like a recipe for disaster. 

Would I of liked for them to do more in the Offseason to invest in the OL? Of course, but a new OL coach could certainly help as Pollack 
couldn't coach anyone up and even proven FA's regressed under his coaching. Lucas Patrick and Dylan Fairchild have been known to be 
good pass protectors and are much more athletic than what we had last year and stay lower in their sets.

We will see how much better the OL is this year. I expect it to be better, I just don't know how much better.

(Yesterday, 09:49 AM)Whatever Wrote: They will likely have 3 new opening day starters this year vs last year.  

Pollack's philosophy just didn't work, especially for our offense.  His "glass eaters" BS was outdated, and we tried for years to make it work with physically overmatched players that had "grit" and "want to".  It was especially mismatched with an offense that wanted to run a lot of wide zone, which requires more athletic linemen capable of making reach blocks and second level blocks.

Spot on.

[Bengalitis]

I hope Burrow doesn't get the Dan Marino curse.... he deserves a SB win... at least one!

[jj22]

(Yesterday, 09:49 AM)Whatever Wrote: They will likely have 3 new opening day starters this year vs last year.  

Pollack's philosophy just didn't work, especially for our offense.  His "glass eaters" BS was outdated, and we tried for years to make it work with physically overmatched players that had "grit" and "want to".  It was especially mismatched with an offense that wanted to run a lot of wide zone, which requires more athletic linemen capable of making reach blocks and second level blocks.

Who's job was it to get the right players in to fit the scheme? That's on Tobin. 

[BoomerFan]

"Can't zero me!"

[*pally*]

(06-30-2025, 01:34 AM)Mer Wrote: I actually find it a little disappointing the first 7 on the list have a higher unpressured rating than Joe. I'm assuming injuries have something to do with it but, dang, Lamar Jackson is higher than Joe unpressured?

Any NFL QB can be accurate when they aren't under pressure.

Joe is a top 4 QB because he plays as well under pressure as he does without it

[*KillerGoose*]

(06-30-2025, 01:34 AM)Mer Wrote: I actually find it a little disappointing the first 7 on the list have a higher unpressured rating than Joe. I'm assuming injuries have something to do with it but, dang, Lamar Jackson is higher than Joe unpressured?

Lamar Jackson has the third highest passer rating in NFL history. As Nicomo pointed out earlier, he has a friendlier system to play within than Joe does, but he is also probably going to be a first ballot Hall of Famer when it is all said and done.