Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument for and against Sewell.
(12-22-2020, 08:58 PM)Whatever Wrote: I've seen that projection more due to his struggles with vertical sets, hip stiffness, and the fact that he plays a lot better going forward than backwards than arm length.

I see you read the draft network breakdown on him haha.

He is a tackle, the tape says tackle. He will be discussed at guard over the next few months because arm length. At whatever type of combine we get I will guarantee the articles before weigh in will talk about his arm length and how he “needs” to measure a certain amount. He is versatile though ( can play all five), so a team with an aging tackle may draft him knowing they could play him at guard year 1 then kick outside kind of like Whitworth.
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: