07-17-2021, 07:42 PM
(07-17-2021, 07:10 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: He did? He had 4 sacks/9 QB Hits against the Steelers. He only played half of a game against DC yet players were credited with 14 QB Hits on Burrow. If he didn't get injured, he was on pace to take somewhere in the range of 25-30 hits in a single game.
It's true he managed to get through the Titans game pretty unscathed, but that is more about the Titans. They were 30th in sacks, 29th in QB Hits, 30th in Hurry %, 27th in Knock Down %, and 31st in Pressure % (worse than the Bengals on a couple of those). The Titans were truly awful at anything to do with getting to the QB last year.
Week 1: 3 Sacks, 6 Hits
Week 2: 3 Sacks, 7 Hits
Week 3: 8 Sacks, 16 Hits
Week 4: 1 Sack, 5 Hits
Week 5: 7 Sacks, 15 Hits
Week 6: 2 Sacks, 6 Hits
Week 7: 4 Sacks, 7 Hits
Week 8: 0 Sacks, 2 Hits
Week 9: 4 Sacks, 9 Hits
Week 10: 0 Sacks, 14 Hits (~1/2 game)
Only 2 teams he didn't get pummeled by? The 31st and 30th teams (also known as the two worst non-Bengals teams) for sacks and he ended his season with his 3rd and on pace for his 1st most hits in a game. There was no improvement as far as not taking hits goes. Even if you are super generous and assume Burrow takes 0 more hits the entire rest of Week 10 if he doesn't get hurt, that would still make Weeks 9-10 tied for the highest amount of hits he took in any 2 game span all year.
Who is responsible for each sack, QB hit, and pressure?