10-25-2021, 08:13 PM
(10-25-2021, 05:13 PM)Stewy Wrote: My parallel is that my 2nd and 3rd lvl bosses both just changed out, which means people making decisions about my performance do not know me at all. We are a performance based industry so it is stressful to change bosses often (every 3 years in my company), that then have to get to know you and your performance, strengths and needs for improvement. Luckily in my case, my first level boss has stayed the same AND with the regime change no one is asking me to do my job in a different way. But it is still stressful.
Bottom line as I see it, the regime change is complete, and there are few to none that are left to dwell on the past. But the emotional and mental cost of the regime change on the players shouldn't be overlooked when compared to their actions. Some could have just conducted themselves better.
p.s. - Huber doesn't count as leftover from the previous regime because Simmons is still here.
To first bolded: Perhaps you should be asking yourself why after witnessing a few regime changes, why you haven't moved up to the 1st or 2nd level "boss" position?
To second bolded: Yes, the new leadership regime has turned over all of the personnel that they felt weren't good fits with their plans moving forward. When leadership changes happen in sports, the turnover of personnel is often much quicker than in the corporate sector.
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23