Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The regression of Jessie Bates
#56
(11-03-2021, 05:22 PM)J24 Wrote: Define long term? I think Rieff will be a good player for us for the next 2-3 seasons + we have young players that the organization likes as backups.

I think the Bengals have some decent backups, but I don't think any will get to the level of being a solid starter.
The one who has the best chance is probably Smith, but we haven't seen enough of him to give that confidence yet.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.

Sorry for Party Rocking!

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - Au165 - 11-01-2021, 08:18 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - jj22 - 11-01-2021, 08:32 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-02-2021, 12:25 AM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-02-2021, 12:42 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - CJD - 11-02-2021, 02:59 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 02:56 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 05:22 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - ochocincos - 11-03-2021, 05:31 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 06:41 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - Dr.Z - 11-04-2021, 10:03 AM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - Tony - 11-03-2021, 01:08 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 05:20 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 06:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)