Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The regression of Jessie Bates
#62
(11-03-2021, 06:29 PM)J24 Wrote: Shake he was a top 10 safety (or close to it) his rookie season and he was a top 12 safety in the 2nd half of the 2019 season. Outside of a bad start to the 2019  season the guy has been excellent during his time here. Neither Williams or Iloka could claim that.

PFF grades
2018- 79.9
2019(2nd half)75.5
2020-90.1

You can't just remove half a season because it doesn't fit the narrative you want though.

He had a 61.2 grade in 2019 and a 61.4 this year. So it really looks like this:

2018: Very good
2019: Slightly above average maybe?
2020: Elite
2021: Slightly above average maybe?

So which guy are we getting if we ink him to a big contract? I value consistency if you're dropping a big contract on a dude.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - Au165 - 11-01-2021, 08:18 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - jj22 - 11-01-2021, 08:32 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-02-2021, 12:25 AM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-02-2021, 12:42 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - CJD - 11-02-2021, 02:59 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 02:56 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 05:22 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 06:41 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - Dr.Z - 11-04-2021, 10:03 AM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - Tony - 11-03-2021, 01:08 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 05:20 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 06:29 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - Shake n Blake - 11-03-2021, 08:57 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)