03-27-2022, 04:11 PM
(03-27-2022, 03:22 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: As for the bold, you should know better. There is often no “physical evidence” in sexual assault cases. That’s par for the course.
Then on what are you basing you claim that Watson is guilty?
Mine is based on the fact that a woman who was legitimately in the therapeutic massage business would have made an immediate report to keep other women in her field from being victimized. In fact any woman in that field legitimately would have walked out if Watson had acted the way they claim he did. These women are supposed to be professionals. If they don't act that way then they don't deserve any "benefit of doubt".
A professional massage therapist would not ask for a private settlement that would have allowed other women to continue to be victimized. BY doing that they lose all credibility with me.
The fact that you are the son of a prosecutor explains why you just automatically assumed he was guilty.
