04-05-2024, 11:23 PM
I'm starting to think so many football fans are so caught
Up in which WR is #1 is #2 etc etc it starts diminish the importance of the #2.
I don't look at Chase and Higgins as #1 and #2. I look
At them as equal components in aoffense that driven
By their WRs. This isn't the Chiefs or Ravens offense
Where the TE is the focal point of the passing game
And the 1 and 2 WRs are clearly defined
Here's a question.....let's say the Bengals have a 7 play
Scoring drive. Burrow throws 6 passes on that drive
Completes 5. Chase catches 4 and 3 go for 1st downs
But Higgins catches 2 ...but 1 is for the go ahead TD.
Who is the number 1 on that drive ?
I think the #1 and number #2 is not always set in stone
Alot depends on how a game unfolds
Who was the number #1 WR in the SB loss to the Rams ?
Up in which WR is #1 is #2 etc etc it starts diminish the importance of the #2.
I don't look at Chase and Higgins as #1 and #2. I look
At them as equal components in aoffense that driven
By their WRs. This isn't the Chiefs or Ravens offense
Where the TE is the focal point of the passing game
And the 1 and 2 WRs are clearly defined
Here's a question.....let's say the Bengals have a 7 play
Scoring drive. Burrow throws 6 passes on that drive
Completes 5. Chase catches 4 and 3 go for 1st downs
But Higgins catches 2 ...but 1 is for the go ahead TD.
Who is the number 1 on that drive ?
I think the #1 and number #2 is not always set in stone
Alot depends on how a game unfolds
Who was the number #1 WR in the SB loss to the Rams ?