Chase not Practicing

[Whatever]

(08-31-2024, 11:42 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Something that hasn't been mentioned is: do we owe it to the other NFL teams not to set this precedent?

Remember when Cleveland fully guaranteed Rub and Tug's contract? Talk was other owners were upset and it hasn't happened since.

Signing a WR to a market-setting deal with 2 years remaining on the rookie contract has never (as far as I know) been done, is this a practice you think other owners want to start?

I get a handful of WRs who have signed lesser contracts this year.

I know the immediate reaction: "We don't owe other teams anything" if that's your thought then I ask you to research NFL Revenue Sharing.

I mean, Penei Sewell signed a contract this off-season that made him the highest paid T in the league with two years left on his deal.  I don't see why it would be any different for a WR.