The offense had no chance

[XsandOs]

(09-13-2024, 05:25 PM)Lucius Cincinnatus Wrote: Lol, you're completely changing the conversation. You said "the Chiefs didn't look good either". I never said the Chiefs looked great, but they certainly did look good. 


The Chiefs had 2 false starts and 6 penalties overall. They averaged 5.3 penalties a game last year. You can watch the replay and see the Ravens player is hitting him as he throws...

Me thinks you're talking out of your as* because nothing you're saying makes sense. When do two good teams play each other and there is mistake free football? Beating a good team is looking good. That's such a stupid argument you're trying to make lol. 

Uhhhhh ya think that their offense didn't look as good as it does against 90% of the league? I wonder if maybe that's because they are playing one of the best defenses in the league and vice versa.

 Yet they still scored 27 against one of the best defense and only gave up 20 against one of the best offenses. 

In all fairness the Chiefs won a game in which their defense had minimal answers for Jackson - who had almost 400 yards against them. He had over 270 yards passing and over 120 yards rushing. 1 TD and no INTs.

Ravens also dominated time of possession with almost 34 minutes.

On offense, with Mahome's INT and Pacheco's 3 YPC average, if it weren't for Worthy designed plays and a toenail out of bounds, the game could have have resulted in what the stats suggest it should.

But of course one can say that good Teams find a way to win - which KC is definitely a good Team. Also, a win is a win, irrespective of how good a Team looks. 

However; to say that KC looked good against the Ravens, may be a stretch.