No real surprises

[CJD]

(10 hours ago)jj22 Wrote: All this was to the point of another Star QB being born in front of our very eyes. Highlighting that Burrow isn't the apple of the NFL eye anymore. Nothing to do with Burrow or his play. More to do with the influx of star QB's. 2 of which we crowned. 

But look no further to the news this morning. A(nother) NFL Star was born last night. Washington isn't trading him for Burrow. And that's my point. Anyone would take a top 5 QB. Can you mention 10 teams that would keep there's over Burrow.....I can. You need more than a star QB in this league. There are too many of them.

I didn't even mention Rodgers. It's a lot of QB's and folks are stuck in the past stil arguing Burrow is top 5 or yes even 10. And if there is a close comparison then wins do break the tie.

Context matters and if you read the thread (which you did) then you saw me continue to praise the offense and Burrow while blaming the defense for the loss. Why didn't you add that to your post? Everything you posted was in regards to Daniels arrival. If you followed the thread it'd be apparent as it was to most.

The only teams that wouldn't trade their QB for Burrow are:
Baltimore
Houston
Kansas City
Buffalo
And Maybe Washington if you think Daniels will do what he did last night for the rest of his career. 

San Francisco is going to have to pay Purdy more than Burrow next offseason and he is not as good as Burrow. 

Goff, Darnold, Hurts, Prescott, Rodgers, Tua, Stafford, Love and Lawrence are all below Burrow by a fair margin for a variety of reasons. All those teams would quickly do a 1 for 1 trade for Joe.