01-17-2025, 01:45 PM
It is good to see the NFL now reviews spots border line on line of gain and now facemask potential penalties. I though they have been quick to rule on no first downs or a first down in NY.
Facemasks should be quick as well. The tough part will be checking for a facemask penalty off the ball. As we know, lots of facemasks occur on other players besides the ball carrier. I like it.
In the age of gambling, it is one more counter motive to stop a compromised ref from determining the outcome of a game.
As for the length the NFL can go to look at a ref's bank records, not an easy lift to get a warrant on a whim of simply thinking a ref is making calls to ensure one team covers the spread.
Maybe an attorney can weigh in on the ease of checking a private citizen's bank records without probable cause.
Facemasks should be quick as well. The tough part will be checking for a facemask penalty off the ball. As we know, lots of facemasks occur on other players besides the ball carrier. I like it.
In the age of gambling, it is one more counter motive to stop a compromised ref from determining the outcome of a game.
As for the length the NFL can go to look at a ref's bank records, not an easy lift to get a warrant on a whim of simply thinking a ref is making calls to ensure one team covers the spread.
Maybe an attorney can weigh in on the ease of checking a private citizen's bank records without probable cause.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Please use 2025 free agency to fix the trenches, not the draft!!!!!!!!
