02-04-2025, 10:54 PM
(02-04-2025, 09:08 PM)FormerlyBengalRugby Wrote: Bengals would be getting fleeced in that deal and not moving ahead.So the Bengals say no?
Garrett is equal or less than Trey, but they are giving up a promising 2nd round pick, and future picks? I get that Garrett e is younger, but also having foot issues, which is never good for a big man.
(02-04-2025, 09:21 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Losing important draft picks in a year when they only have 6 to begin with, and throwing in a promising prospect? No, I cannot get on board with that idea. The Bengals defense is more than one player away from being great, and you're suggesting trading a second round pick after a promising rookie year??So the Bengals say no?
It takes a lot more than sacks to compose a strong defense. But that's definitely a Mike Brown type of move, go big on the perimeter players and stay soft in the middle...
(02-04-2025, 09:54 PM)007BengalsFan Wrote: The Bengals lose their 1st round draft pick, their 3rd round draft pick, Trey Hendrickson and Kris Jenkins to pick up Garrett and a late 2nd round pick. That is one of the worst suggested trades I have ever read on this forumSo the Bengals say no?
I