Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki
(7 hours ago)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: All good points, also if a team wants Trey they probably wouldn't JUST have to give us a first round pick, might have to give us a player
of need as well. I am finding it far fetched a team will give us all that. I don't even know of a player on the Commanders we would want
after Jonathan Allen and we can get him on the street now.

Milton Williams will cost a bunch, thinking Allen and Sweat would be about all we could get for the DL while bringing back Trey.

Either way, it is better than last year and our rookies won't be rookies no more.

Agreed!
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - Synric - Yesterday, 02:07 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - pally - Yesterday, 02:08 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - jj22 - Yesterday, 02:41 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - jj22 - Yesterday, 02:48 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - J24 - Yesterday, 02:53 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - jj22 - Yesterday, 02:59 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - J24 - Yesterday, 03:05 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - J24 - Yesterday, 02:55 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - J24 - Yesterday, 04:12 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - jj22 - Yesterday, 03:02 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - wanga - Yesterday, 08:38 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - CJD - Yesterday, 03:16 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - CJD - Yesterday, 03:22 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - Nepa - Yesterday, 03:46 PM
RE: Bengals re-sign Mike Gesicki - XsandOs - 7 hours ago

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: phil413, 5 Guest(s)