5 hours ago
(5 hours ago)Luvnit2 Wrote: Normally I would agree. Problem is the FO should not tear up 2025. The higher numbers should be for 2026 and 2027 and highly incintivized.
If it begins we a 3, in my opinion it also should be tied to incentives (no guarantees).
Guy has started 78 games in the last 5 seasons (15.6 per year) with 70.5 sacks (14.1 per year) and you're going to offer him an incentive laiden contract?
Clown move.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"Hope is not a strategy"
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
