10 hours ago
(10 hours ago)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Yes. But it is pretty close.
Trey had way better pass rush numbers and way less help. Probably Trey as pure pass rusher. Overall, Watt probably has a slight edge. Garrett a bigger one.
Trey lead the league in sacks, pressures, quick pressures, and sack rate. Led in sacks created with 26 while no one else had more than 14 IIRC. 3rd in quick pressure rate.
https://charlieschalkboard.substack.com/p/what-trey-hendrickson-is-and-what
Now, Trey is not a great run defender. And he takes himself out of some plays getting too wide/upfield too much.
I think Garrett is clearly better & more well rounded. But Watt is more questionable.
PFF:
Player: Overall, Pass, Run
Garrett: 92.3, 92.8, 78.4
Hendrickson: 88.1, 90.4, 65.9
Watt: 92.2, 90.1, 90.4
I am tying to understand how Trey is ranked 65.9% againts the run aand 90.4 against the pass and that equals 88.1% overall? Shouldn't his overall be closer to 80.0%?
People want to ignore ho wpoor he is against the run when camparing him to the best like Watt. But, to get pai as much, he needs to be much better againts the run. No way he should expect Watt money or Garrett based on his results in my opinion. My hunch is Trey and a lot of our fans are over valuing his overall game.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Please use 2025 free agency to fix the trenches, not the draft!!!!!!!!