05-30-2025, 03:08 PM
this is an easy one, where both sides have a point, I would say both sides need to come to an agreement, no other way around.
Trey's pros: he showed last season he is still relevant and been the last couple of seasons.
cons: he is getting older and a gamble for the bengals (injury, laziness or lackluster season)
bengals pros: they can offer less and/or per market average
cons: they don't have anything better to replace him with at the moment. No edge, no playoffs.
Trey's pros: he showed last season he is still relevant and been the last couple of seasons.
cons: he is getting older and a gamble for the bengals (injury, laziness or lackluster season)
bengals pros: they can offer less and/or per market average
cons: they don't have anything better to replace him with at the moment. No edge, no playoffs.