06-03-2025, 09:29 AM
(06-02-2025, 01:46 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: They spent $28.75m/yr on their 0x Pro Bowl #2 WR who last had 1k yards 3 years ago.
But the 1st Team All-Pro back-to-back 17.5 sack guy should take even less than that because otherwise the Bengals can't afford to keep a defense together? Lol
(06-03-2025, 01:19 AM)Essex Johnson Wrote: i would have preferred to redo Tre contract over Higgins but i think the Burrow pressure on FO influenced that, but i would not sign him to his asking price of 40 m
How are we missing the point that the Higgins discussion is irrelevant in the Trey matter because Higgins getting what he did had to do with coercion and blackmail by Chase vs. the FO valuing Higgins over Trey.
Seriously, Higgins doesn't matter in the discussion because the FO had no choice except to lose Chase/Higgins or keep both. So the real discussion is Chase/Higgins vs. Trey not Higgins vs. Trey.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)