06-03-2025, 06:11 PM
(06-03-2025, 06:03 PM)NUGDUKWE Wrote: If it is years that is the big hang up on the contract than it makes the Bengals look so much worse in my opinion. I get he's older but if you give him a 3 year extension locking him up the next four seasons. If he starts to gradually decline and he isn't that good in year 3 cut your losses in that last year. It's like the Bengals are willing to risk losing talent and lesser chance of winning in order to avoid a relatively small amount of dead money.
That assumes the guaranteed money is low. If Trey is looking for years and guaranteed money then it makes sense?
