11 hours ago
(Yesterday, 12:54 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: It really doesn't. Maybe a little bit, but this makes the agent look greedy and uncompromising (in a bad way).
It's not a good look for either side, but it's like 85/15 on the part of the agent.
Im not rooting for the agent over the FO. Just merely trying to look at it from an outside perspective. Not sure how this makes the agent look bad. Bengals want to change theyre precedent which is fine. They are just asking to give something in return. Seems fair to me.
Perhaps I blame the Bengals FO a bit more here just for the fact this seems like an extremely easy fix yet we've let it drag on where he is almost the last to sign, he made some poor comments to the media and he was the only 1st rd rookie who hasn't done any practice work.
