7 hours ago
(7 hours ago)ochocincos Wrote: Yea I got that, but what's the incentive for Cowboys to give up their 1st and get Hendrickson for 2025 vs just keeping Parsons?
Parsons and Hendrickson should cost nearly the same APY, just Parsons will likely get an extra year (or two) more than Hendrickson.
And if Bengals are hesitant to pay Hendrickson, I don't have confidence they would pay Parsons that kinda money either.
The Cowboys are getting a first back not trading thier first.
The reason why I brought this up is because the Cowboys have concerns about paying Parsons long term.
