Yesterday, 05:55 PM
(Yesterday, 03:43 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: i see two big issues with resigning Tre, once we signed Higgins, that limited how much we could offer him, and him wanting a 3/4 year contract at his age, they might be still stinging from signing Geno, just to reflect back , Geno was 30 coming off another stellar season, signed him to a 4 year contract , we got 2 years out of him and he was done.
The issue with limited resources is completely the Bengals making. They could've easily structured things to have the room to easily sign him. I also think so many contracts the final year doesnt even count as players are just released if they aren't living up to the contract value that it seems the "years" part of the contract should almost be a non issue.
I still think the contract gets done. But no matter where you stand on Trey wanting to pay him or not I am curious if people will be upset if we dont sign him or any other players after freeing up more cap space. I see no reason at all we shouldn't be spending the available cap space we still have this year.
