Yesterday, 08:08 PM
(Yesterday, 07:56 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Your argument falls apart when you factor in we have 32 million in cap space which includes Trey's 2025 cap hit.
Sorry, you are wrong as we have all the cap space we need to give Trey an extra 13 to 15 million (depending on structure more) if we extend Trey in 2025. You do know he is under contract now.
My argument doesnt fall apart. 32 million in cap space is the very reason people are upset. That number could've been pushing 50 million if the Bengals just did the average with theyre contract structure. We could've signed Trey and a couple more starters.