11 hours ago
(11 hours ago)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: I guess there were other things Fred brought to the table, good point. Still, I couldn't stand how someone would make a thread and
Fred would get in it and just high jack it into another one of his arguments showing he was all stats and not a fan of actually watching
the damn game.
My favorite memory of Fred was when he made a statement so obviously wrong that he was called on it and then, rather than concede the argument, decided to redefine one of the terms in his statement to a meaning that no one would ever use -- indeed, was opposite of what the term actually meant. Fred never lost an argument that I remember. He just created new definitions for terms. His saving grace is that he kept the conversations going in the off-season. Never a dull moment with Fred. Ditto for Joe from Florence.
Edit: That was really off-tangent. But when a thread reaches 75 pages and still the issue remains the same as in the first page, then I guess we should have liberty to open up the conversation.
