Is Shemar holding out?

[SunsetBengal]

(Yesterday, 07:55 PM)Destro Wrote: Based on what he is seeing now, he can ball out and still have contract issues. Trey plays the same position, did great and is unhappy with the dealings. Why would Stewart think it may be different for him when his rookie contract is not coming out how he likes it?

I’m not saying Stewart hasn’t signed because of the Trey situation, but pretty sure they watch the news, as well.

That has no bearing on rookie deals. They are slotted with a max value that is all guaranteed over the life of the contract. There are situations that allow the team to discontinue paying for a player that might not be available because of his own actions. Should a team be forced to pay for a guy that can't be available to the team due to actions of his own? I mean injuries happen and he should still get paid, but for example bad behavior like buying a supercar and causing harm to others like a recent case shouldn't hold the team on the hook.