Trey Hendrickson Update

[Sled21]

(Yesterday, 09:58 AM)ochocincos Wrote: I know that, but it's not like Hendrickson is actually showing any decline.
Let's not put ourselves into another Whitworth situation where the team decides to move on because they think he's too old despite not showing any real decline and then that player ends up being a cornerstone piece for a deep postseason/super bowl run for someone else.
TJ Watt and Myles Garrett just got top-dollar deals and they are about the same age as TH.
Sometimes you take the risk because the player is that good still at 29-30 years old.

And that's fine it that's the position people want to take. But if you take that position, you can't turn around and complain about the Bengals keeping aging players to long. History said Whitworth was close to done. He was an outlier. History says DE's fall off after 30, Trey may or may not be an outlier. But if a person is for keeping him (I am, just not a 3 or 4 year guarantee), then don't complain when we are paying him for no production.