07-23-2025, 05:14 PM
(07-23-2025, 05:07 PM)Sled21 Wrote: Is all that money better spent on an aging player who "may be great" again for one, maybe two seasons, or upgrading several positions across the defense with the same money?
Because they do that so often and so well?
They’ve had exactly 2 decent free agencies in all the years it’s existed. 20 & 21. That’s it. The rest have ranged from mediocre to abysmal.
It’s pretty simple: if a team doesn’t particularly draft well, and also never goes big game hunting in FA, then they should probably prioritize paying the guys that are actually worth the money (see Whit & Bates).
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)