07-23-2025, 05:43 PM
(07-23-2025, 05:22 PM)Sled21 Wrote: It may have been AI, I don't know, I'm at work and just quickly googled the age NFL DE's decline. Who cares if it's AI or not, is the information wrong???????
I trust AI about as much as I trust sports writers, so have at it.
Doing your own research instead of relying solely on an AI tool and copy/pasting its responses into an open debate can be a smarter, more credible, and more respectful approach. Here’s why:
? Deeper Understanding and Retention
When you personally investigate a topic—reading articles, watching lectures, engaging with source materials—you’re more likely to:
- Understand the nuances of the issue.
- Form your own informed opinions rather than parroting someone else's.
- Retain the knowledge, which helps you adapt during a live or dynamic discussion.
? Source Awareness and Credibility
When you do your own research, you can:
- Evaluate the credibility of your sources.
- Verify the context and see whether the facts are widely accepted or contested.
- Cite specific authors or studies, which adds intellectual weight and accountability to your argument.
? Stronger Debate Skills
Debate isn’t just about having the "right" answer—it’s about how you:
- Construct arguments.
- Understand opposing views.
- Think critically and respond flexibly.
?️ Avoiding Misuse or Errors
AI-generated content can sometimes:
- Be outdated or subtly incorrect.
- Miss important context or caveats.
- Sound overconfident in uncertain areas.
? Respect for the Discussion Space
In an open forum:
- People expect engaged discussion, not just regurgitated text.
- Thoughtful contributions earn more respect and are more persuasive.
- You avoid the impression of “outsourcing” your viewpoint to a machine.
✅ Bottom Line
Use tools like AI to get started, gather leads, or clarify complex ideas. But treat that as a launchpad—not a shortcut. Your own engagement with the material is what makes your argument compelling, credible, and capable of standing up to real scrutiny.