Is Shemar holding out?

[Stewy]

(07-23-2025, 05:33 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Nice attempt, Cleveland gave him that money already knowing about it. They went into that situation fully knowing who they were paying and what he did. They even formatted the contract so that while he was suspended the first year of it he'd lose less money.

So yes, if Mike Brown is seeing a team give a contract to a guy who ends up sucking and thinks "I want to get out of paying a guy his guaranteed money if I don't want to" then it goes exactly back to the point of... why is a player guilty of something for not wanting to give away his guarantees to the whims of someone who doesn't want to pay him?

Was it you who claimed this before or was it someone else? Because it's just as much of a lie now as it was earlier. The Raiders aren't paying a WR to sit in jail.

Honest questions because I'm not scrolling back through 50 pages of redundant spam to see if it was asked.....

So the Raiders have a guy in jail?  

Did the contract language protect the Raiders?  

Do we know specifically if that contract language was specific to felonious crime or broad brush?  

Do we know for a fact the language that the Bengals are trying to use is different from the 20+ others teams (according to Joe Goodberry) that use similar language?