11 hours ago
(07-24-2025, 08:41 AM)Destro Wrote: How does him "planning on committing crimes" apply to anything I said?
From what I hear, it isn't about specifically committing crimes, but language that may include simple violations.
Why would we want an organization who will strip the pay for a guy who gets in trouble for smaller things, like caught on video doing reckless driving? Didn't Tee and Chase do that? Still want those guys on the team, right?
If the organization has zero plans to take money for him getting a roughing the passer calls against the Steelers or other things that no one should be concerned about, why can't they install a red line violation in the contract? Be specific and not vague.
We still drafted that guy. From what I have seen, his production was a question, not criminal actions. Burton got drafted and he didn't have the language in the contract.
It’s the opposite on the clause. The rules on these contracts are regulated and all contracts must be approved by the league office. At least the rookie contracts. All the teams adopted this language. The agent is a nobody. He’s protecting himself as he loses the money too. He’s the one who’s probably worried not the Bengals.
Romo “ so impressed with Zac ...1 of the best in the NFL… they are just fundamentally sound. Taylor the best winning % in the Playoffs of current coaches. Joe Burrow” Zac is the best head coach in the NFL & that gives me a lot of confidence." Taylor led the Bengals to their first playoff win since 1990, ending the longest active drought in the four major North American sports, en and appeared in Super Bowl LVI, the first since 1988.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)