9 hours ago
(10 hours ago)Soonerpeace Wrote: Yes it does. The clause in the contract isn’t what you think. It doesn’t include simple violations. Your words. The NFLPA would never allow it. The contract would never be approved on a rookie one. So it has everything to do with what you are talking about. Guess again.
You have no idea what I think it is, so park that idea. "Does not include simple violations" is subjective, as a former Raider, now disagrees what is or is not a enough to void "guaranteed" money. For separate example, missing weight and killing someone are far different things, but where the redline for "simple" my lie for one person may differ from another, say a player than ownership. The "but other teams" or "this agent" still didn't get change get pen to paper until this week.
Like a teenage girl driving a Ferrari.
