“I don’t want to pay more money for the same team”

[Essex Johnson]

(7 hours ago)Soonerpeace Wrote: I’ve posted this on this board a dozen times. I’ll find them. Yes I said Pro Bowl but the other 11 times I’ve said starters. The bottom line is the bottom line. Don’t give 2 craps about Pitt or the Browns. The narrative is our poor drafting in the first 3 rounds in 21-24. If you are a supporter of those drafts then we will definitely disagree. The Ravens got 9 starters we got 4 out of those 12. Our drafting hasn’t been good. The Ravens 9 starters vs our 4 for 21-24 on rookie deals helps them immensely

Look i was just responded to your post to show you that even the better teams in AFC plus our division which i do believe it important have not had much or any success with pro bowlers outside of Balt.  As for starters, way too many variables go into looking at team and who starts and does not in rookie to year 3rd but seen you looked at the Ravens, right now 8 to 9 players from 22-24 are expected to start, if you include 21, looking at 9 to 10. Final comment on this, ive stated numerous times, you will need to weight till 3rd/4th year to evaluate a player, development does not end when they leave college, some players take time to adjust or develop to the level of the NFL, others like say Burton has growing pains and issues which can make their start of careeer less than desireable,