Yesterday, 12:11 PM
(07-28-2025, 11:29 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I don't think many disagree Sooner and Nepa, but I am not sure FO wants to put guaranteed money into year 3. A trade off would be for some guarantee in year 3 in exchange for lower salary in year 2. So far no one has blinked, but I do thing Trey wants to play in Cincy and Bengals want him. This is far cry to how Carson Palmer held out for those bashing Trey. His comments of late have been professional and MB's were as well.
I think they get it done sooner than later. This is a distarction for fans, but not for players or coaches who have too much on their schedule right now to worry about Trey. Many are trying to make a team, climb up depth charts or young guys trying to learn,
I am not in favored of guaranteed money in year 3. Trey turns 31 during the season (December), I would be concerned about production in year 3. But I thought the hang up was guaranteed money in year 2. That I would be in favor of. I think Trey is a vital player, causes havoc for opposing QBs, is a workhorse who outperformed his contract, and if the hang up is guaranteed money in season 2, the Bengals should do that. Trey deserved it, and the Bengals need him.
