Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals
#13
(01-15-2016, 06:47 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: He kicked Burfict in the ankle after Burfict kicked him in the ankle.

This?




Ridiculous.

(01-15-2016, 07:27 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Is Gilberry's fine related to bumping into porter or something else?

Bumping porter.

(01-15-2016, 07:55 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: So when burfict's suspension is reduced to a fine or just 1 game how upset will people get?  

It should only be a fine.  

I hope this offseason they sort out the hitting thing.   Only hits leading with the head should be called.   And all these should be reviewable.  

Also found it interesting that blandino said the Bryant catch wasn't a catch.

It may be reduced.  My guess is two games.  He's a repeat offender not just of hit during play but also of stuff AFTER the play.  That's why it wasn't just a fine.

Could you link where Blandino said it wasn't a catch?  I've checked his twitter feed and haven't seen the officiating video yet.

(01-15-2016, 08:14 PM)cinci4life Wrote: Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought he was in New York to help the replay officials during the playoffs. If so, where the hell was he on that one???

He was there.  That's why I curious that Lucy saw this and no one else has.

(01-15-2016, 08:17 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: I read the explanation, and read the rule, and I still don't get why Shazier's hit was not a penalty nor fined. Oh well. Would love to hear an explanation as to why the Shawn Williams hit was a foul. It is what it is, I think that all parties need to put it behind them and stop this kind of embarrassment from happening again.

I also fully expect these "hit to the head" plays to become reviewable in the future.

The only explanation I heard that makes any sense was that Shazier didn't leave his feet.  That's all I got.

I wish they were reviewed.  A lot of bang-bang get called that are not.

EDIT:

Found another thread about Blandino.  He didn't say it "wasn't a catch".

He said it may have not been a catch but there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call.

I quoted the article in the other thread here.
[Image: giphy.webp]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - GMDino - 01-15-2016, 09:37 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)