Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD

Thread Rating:

2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD

Fan_in_Kettering Offline

Superstar

Posts: 8,726
Threads: 301
Reputation: 74137
Joined: Jan 2016
Location: Kettering, Ohio

#30

01-17-2016, 09:43 PM

(01-17-2016, 06:42 PM)Blake2Pickens Wrote: It was not a penalty

Bernard fumbled

Clear recovery

Pittsburgh TD. The refs botched it by blowing the whistle.

Facts hurt

The Steelers have a message board. You should join it.

Find

Reply/Quote

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Blake2Pickens - 01-17-2016, 06:29 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Brownshoe - 01-17-2016, 06:30 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - rfaulk34 - 01-17-2016, 06:31 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - leonardfan40 - 01-17-2016, 06:31 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - TheLeonardLeap - 01-17-2016, 06:33 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - NATI BENGALS - 01-17-2016, 06:34 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - HarleyDog - 01-17-2016, 06:35 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Joelist - 01-17-2016, 06:36 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - BengalB - 01-17-2016, 08:15 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Blake2Pickens - 01-17-2016, 08:25 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - The Real Deal - 01-17-2016, 06:40 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - J24 - 01-17-2016, 06:40 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - McC - 01-17-2016, 06:43 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - The Real Deal - 01-17-2016, 06:44 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - GodFather - 01-19-2016, 12:27 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Blake2Pickens - 01-17-2016, 06:42 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - BeepBeepWoo - 01-17-2016, 06:42 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Fan_in_Kettering - 01-17-2016, 09:43 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - BeepBeepWoo - 01-17-2016, 09:53 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Daddy-O - 01-18-2016, 10:26 AM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Blake2Pickens - 01-17-2016, 06:46 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - BeepBeepWoo - 01-17-2016, 06:47 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - rfaulk34 - 01-17-2016, 07:04 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Murdock2420 - 01-17-2016, 06:56 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Go Cards - 01-18-2016, 12:50 AM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - samhain - 01-18-2016, 01:06 AM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - masonbengals fan - 01-17-2016, 06:59 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - EatonFan - 01-17-2016, 09:53 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Shake n Blake - 01-17-2016, 06:47 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Wyche'sWarrior - 01-18-2016, 12:29 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Blake2Pickens - 01-17-2016, 06:56 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - The Real Deal - 01-17-2016, 07:01 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Joelist - 01-17-2016, 07:11 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - tjcase85 - 01-17-2016, 08:26 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Blake2Pickens - 01-17-2016, 08:28 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Brownshoe - 01-17-2016, 08:31 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - McC - 01-17-2016, 08:39 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - tigerseye - 01-18-2016, 01:11 AM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Housh - 01-18-2016, 01:14 AM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - reuben.ahmed - 01-18-2016, 12:30 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - BayouBengal - 01-18-2016, 07:17 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Wyche'sWarrior - 01-19-2016, 12:19 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - BengalChris - 01-18-2016, 07:35 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - bengals67 - 01-18-2016, 09:31 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - tigerseye - 01-18-2016, 10:23 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - McC - 01-19-2016, 12:21 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - RunKijanaRun - 01-19-2016, 01:13 PM

RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - WeezyBengal - 01-19-2016, 01:18 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me