What Andy is doing to cut down turnovers.

[Brownshoe]

(06-20-2015, 03:18 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: What does history matter when we're comparing #2 wide receivers in a particular year? You pointed out how well he did in '01 and then you turned around and asked what Dalton had; which just so happens to be a WR with almost the exact same numbers, in one of the years you questioned. 

You can keep typing walls of words, but it won't erase you propping up one #2 WR while degrading another #2 WR with the same numbers. 

Candles aren't meant to be burned on both ends. Readjust your stance, homie.

You must be confusing me with someone else with that last line of your post. I've never said anything like that.

P.S. Patten and Simpson each have the same line... 16G  14GS

The fact of the matter is Brady still had much better weapons than Dalton in 2011. Brady had an All-pro receiver that year, Dalton did not. Brady had a good run game that year, Dalton did not. Yeah Brady and Dalton's #2 receiver posted the same stats, but that was Simpson's career best, but it wasn't Pattens career best. Overall Pattens was better than Simpson. All you're doing is clinging on to a #2 receiver and saying, See! Dalton hasn't had it that bad!