Browns interested in McCarron per Mary Kay Cabot

[Shake n Blake]

(04-11-2017, 09:59 PM)BenZoo2 Wrote: FA RT?  They don't sign fa.  The didn't even keep their own FA LT.  I blame ebenezer


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's a little inside (fart) joke.

(04-12-2017, 12:15 AM)BigSeph Wrote: Went 2-2 with him as a starter, the two losses were to the eventual SB champion Denver Broncos in Denver in overtime, and to the Pittsburgh Steelers after the Bengals had the lead and the ball with less than 3 minutes to play.  Before Hill, Pacman and Burfict choked.


This is as stupid as saying "If ANY of the other 31 other teams felt like Tom Brady was a star in the making, they would've (a) drafted him in rounds 1-5 of the 2000 draft...when he was well known as the QB of Michigan, or (b) offered a 1st to the Patriots while he was on the bench behind Bledsoe."
I'm not saying AJM = Tom Brady (despite the similarities in rate passing stats in their first NFL season of experience).  What I'm saying is that your premise is really stupid.
Gosh why didn't teams draft Aaron Rodgers when they all had the chance.  Why didn't teams all draft Drew Brees when they had the chance.  Why didn't teams draft Tony Romo at all, or at least trade for him when he was riding the pine in Dallas?
Don't quit your day job, whatever that is.

So like I said...2-3 as starter.

By your logic, I could claim Jeff Driskell is the next Tom Brady. It's not like it's been proven he's not. The rest of the league has had 5 games of NFL tape on McCarron for the last 2 offseasons. If he were as impressive in that span as you claim, and is "a star in the making", then he should've been moved last year. Like I said, I'm sure the Bengals aren't asking THAT much. A 1st would certainly get it done. Probably a 2nd. Yet, as of now, he's still a Bengal.