Zamp is gone...So what?

[Hoofhearted]

(09-18-2017, 11:27 AM)CageTheBengal Wrote: Does it really feel any better that the players had to force Marvin's hand to make a change? I mean yeah he's gone but it didn't come across like it was a move he thought was necessary at the moment so if the near mutiny hadn't happened it would've been business as usual with Marv and the Bengals giving someone way too many chances past their expiration date.

Brad St Louis
Mike Nugent
John Thorton
Kyle Cook
Eric Ghiuchucka
Keiwan Ratliff


are some of the guys who come off of the top of my head who had way too many chances despite clearly sucking. I guess my point is it doesn't really matter to me what this team does at this point (unless something crazy like a playoff win.) Marvin still gives me no hope of winning a Superbowl. He fails to adapt to situations time and time again and when he does it's way too late and it the team had to pay too big of a price.

I mean Brad St Louis the long snapper ruined how many games for us? The freakin long snapper can't even be replaced quickly.

The very thing that kept the Bengals relevant (out of the 90's mantra) is going to be their ultimate undoing. What's extremely frustrating is that will not change no matter what. So even if when we fire Marv, the same organizational philosophy remains in tact. They just made it seem like they did something bold and innovative. But it's really just washing and repeating the same mistakes over and over again.