03-23-2018, 12:24 PM
(03-23-2018, 10:27 AM)fredtoast Wrote: I think part of it is that in a 4-3 scheme the LBs are not supposed to be the big play makers. Most "big name" LBs are 3-4 OLBs who get tons of sacks
But we have still missed on a lot of players.
When Marvin first arrived he brought in a lot of LBs. Free agents Kevin Hardy and Nate Webster . Two third rounders in '04 (Landon Johnson, Caleb Miller) and a first and second rounder in '05 (Pollack and Thurman). But none of them worked out very well.
Then after that we did not seem to be really interested in LBs until we used a first on Rivers and a second on Maualuga.
I definitely agree with this. The only "playmaker" from LB position is supposed to be the WILL (at least from what I recall some people saying in the past). The MIKE and SAM are supposed to be quality role players but don't need to be elite.
The playmakers are supposed to be:
DEs
3T
WILL
CBs
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!