Defense (Deep-Dive Analysis using PFF Ratings)

[SunsetBengal]

(11-03-2018, 11:59 PM)hollodero Wrote: OK, overall that seems to show what many thought anyway. I just have one minor question.


So 91.0 and not enough snaps to be rated... so why is he rated? My question is a bit less dull than that, I see him having not much playtime and he also had that one huge play - that probably contributes to that rating in a pretty overproportional manner. I don't know how PFF rates, but using that elite tag seems grossly distorted.

The 91 rating is just how his performance has been graded from the plays that he's been on the field.  The part about not being ranked, is because there is a minimum percentage of snaps, in order to be included in overall rankings.  In other words, it avoids having spot players that do well from skewing the overall rankings of players that see significant action. (outliers)