Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If GM holding Marvin back, then why has Marvin never left to a better Opportunity/GM?
(11-26-2018, 11:50 PM)Whatever Wrote: O'Neal had 9 picks in '01.  Pretty sure he made it as a CB.

Thornton started 16 games his second year in the league.  He only played 3 the following year when dealing with injury, but started all 16 games the following year before hitting FA.  He was not a backup that left to be a starter.

Nobody wanted TO's attitude, but he still had plenty of ability.

Bryant hid his injury, but he was a big name.  He and TO were the top rated UFA WR's in the 2010 class.

If the complaint is not adding quality veterans to help Marvin win(as Fred has), then it's more than fair to point out quality veterans the team added via trade.

Look...any argument about Marvin starts and stops with MB and the Bengals Management because they choose to have him as the coach.

We all know that we have a small scouting dept.

Tom Coughlin interviewed here and supposedly told his friends that he didn't know if he could win here the way the organization was structured.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: If GM holding Marvin back, then why has Marvin never left to a better Opportunity/GM? - THE PISTONS - 11-27-2018, 01:08 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)