Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who would you rather have for all 16 games?
#99
(08-21-2020, 07:04 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: You remember it.

The reason Green hasn’t shown that in nearly three years is because of injury, aka durability. And yet he still played more games than Ross and was more productive than Ross. You don’t get to ignore Ross’s lack of durability while simultaneously using durability to claim Green isn’t the player he once was because you haven’t seen it because of . . . durability.

I did not say Green wasn't the same player because of his injuries.  I described him not having the same performances as earlier in his career when he was healthy now.  He is 32 years old and far more NFL WRs have dropped off here than even stayed the course, let alone captured some of their earlier magic.  

His injuries may have affected his speed, ability to separate, etc.  We won't know until we see him.  But it isn't durability.  Sorry.  Again, I removed that from this discussion.  It is the player he is today vs. the player Ross is today.  
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Who would you rather have for all 16 games? - SHRacerX - 08-22-2020, 09:54 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)