10-01-2020, 04:57 PM
(10-01-2020, 12:49 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: I just checked Bobby Harts PFF score at it's 65 for the year. Jonah, I believe was, 66.
Did PFF change their rating system? Because the way it used to work was these would have put them smack damn in the middle of a "backup" grade.
I'm pretty sure 60-69 is backup, starter is 70-84, I think 84-89 is like Pro Bowl, and 90-100 is elite. And I think anything under 60 is replaceable.
So unless something has changed, Bobby Hart is currently clocking somewhere around the level you would expect for 48th best RT in the league.
To the person who claimed it, how is that average, or slightly below? He needs to be at like a 75-77 for that to be true, would he not?
65 is still kind of green, more of an olive green but approaching yellow on their grading scale.
If you set the minimum snaps at 50% of max (that being the player who has played the most snaps), you get a list of 64 Tackles that meet that criteria. Players #32 and #33 have grades in the high 60's--69.5 and 68.7
Those guys would be considered "average", by that list. Williams is #36 and Hart is #40.
Quick EDIT:
If i reset the list for pass blocking only, the #32 and #33 guys are graded 72.6 and 72.2. On that list, Williams is #37 and Hart is #53
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."