MyBB Internal: One or more warnings occurred. Please contact your administrator for assistance.
Should the Bengals stop using hybrid defenses?
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should the Bengals stop using hybrid defenses?
#1
I am going to say yes and this is my reasoning. Feel free to disagree but at least state why.

First, I think the constantly changing and weird sets are hampering the progress of our young linebackers. We actually can field a LB core for a 4-3 (Pratt, Wilson, ADG) or a 3-4 (Pratt, Bynes, Wilson, ADG) and if we would pick one and stick to it as the base these young backers would be able to develop as a unit and would not have constantly changing areas they have to cover - which leads to confusion especially with inexperienced players.

Second, picking either 4-3 or 3-4 and sticking to it as the base would help the defense develop some kind of identity. Right now they play like 11 players sent out there unsure of their responsibilities and not really feeling what they as a group are good at.

Whether they did 4-3 or 3-4 pick one. Right now with the depleted DL we might be better at 3-4 but either way choose one and stick with it both in practice and in play.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Should the Bengals stop using hybrid defenses? - Joelist - 11-04-2020, 04:43 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)