Should the Bengals stop using hybrid defenses?

[*ochocincos*]

(11-04-2020, 04:43 PM)Joelist Wrote: I am going to say yes and this is my reasoning. Feel free to disagree but at least state why.

First, I think the constantly changing and weird sets are hampering the progress of our young linebackers. We actually can field a LB core for a 4-3 (Pratt, Wilson, ADG) or a 3-4 (Pratt, Bynes, Wilson, ADG) and if we would pick one and stick to it as the base these young backers would be able to develop as a unit and would not have constantly changing areas they have to cover - which leads to confusion especially with inexperienced players.

Second, picking either 4-3 or 3-4 and sticking to it as the base would help the defense develop some kind of identity. Right now they play like 11 players sent out there unsure of their responsibilities and not really feeling what they as a group are good at.

Whether they did 4-3 or 3-4 pick one. Right now with the depleted DL we might be better at 3-4 but either way choose one and stick with it both in practice and in play.

I think it's pretty clear that it's been a tough transition from Marvin's 4-3 model into the hybrid.
They don't really have guys who are well-suited for 3-4 DE.
With that said, Hubbard has some coverage ability, so he can play OLB.
I don't think Atkins fits as a 3-4 DL. He's not as long as guys like JJ Watt and Cam Heyward to play 3-4 DE. He's not as big as someone like Ngata to be a true 3-4 NT.
I thought Dunlap had the length and size to play 3-4 DE, but it seems the coaching staff wanted him at OLB in a 3-4 setting.

I agree they need to pick one and stick with it, especially from a personnel standpoint.
Going back to 4-3 is easier based on current staff.
Going to 3-4 will require moving on from certain players.
They need to make the decision so they know what type of players to pursue in the offseason.