Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(Not) Saved by the Bell
#18
(11-16-2020, 11:14 AM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: Not subpar at all; he's great V the run and getting guys in position on the field: his intangibles are vast.

The problem is use; he should NOT be in coverage on a ******* WR, as that is a mismatch of the worst-kind.

On blitzes and in the run game, he has been more than fine.

True. He's 44th overall on PFF but 15th against the run and 7th tackling. 

Pass rush 34th and coverage 53rd. 





[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
1
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
(Not) Saved by the Bell - GreenCornBengal - 11-16-2020, 10:14 AM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - SHRacerX - 11-16-2020, 10:36 AM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - Truck_1_0_1_ - 11-16-2020, 11:14 AM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - rfaulk34 - 11-21-2020, 04:45 PM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - Gdale_Bengal - 11-16-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - wildcatnku24 - 11-16-2020, 11:27 AM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - Gdale_Bengal - 11-16-2020, 12:18 PM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - JSR18 - 11-20-2020, 03:36 PM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - Truck_1_0_1_ - 11-16-2020, 11:22 AM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - bengalfan74 - 11-20-2020, 12:02 PM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - bfine32 - 11-20-2020, 12:14 PM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - bfine32 - 12-12-2020, 02:18 PM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - ochocincos - 11-20-2020, 02:15 PM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - Wes Mantooth - 11-20-2020, 02:36 PM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - samhain - 11-21-2020, 05:39 PM
RE: (Not) Saved by the Bell - JSR18 - 12-12-2020, 08:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)