Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is 3-12-1 that much better than 2-13-1?
#22
(12-26-2020, 12:32 PM)Sled21 Wrote: Except for when it's our offensive guys, then injuries are no excuse for poor play.

Legit EVERY TEAM has injuries.

Look at our running game last year. Yeah Jonah and Boling were out. People wanted to use that excuse that no one could run with our line. But, half way through the year, the Bengals changed blocking schemes...and could run and ran really well.

This year we have Jonah back. Added Spain. Added XSF. And...CAN'T RUN THE BALL.

Blaming injuries is the losers lament. We need coaches who can own the situation and fix things!

The Packers won the SB with about 9-10 starters out one year. Good coaching can overcome injuries.

Bad coaching uses that as an excuse to win 2 and 3.5 games.

IF you need EVERYONE healthy to win 5-6 games...that's a major problem.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Is 3-12-1 that much better than 2-13-1? - THE PISTONS - 12-26-2020, 02:56 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)